I Can't Drive 55
Yet another state bumps up max highway speed to 70 miles per hour
Posted by Joshua Condon on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:24 AM
The national 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was enacted in 1973 -- but do you know why? Rather than a safety issue, it was a fuel-saving measure put in place as a response to the first OPEC oil embargo.
The law was later changed to allow speeds up to 65 miles per hour, and in 1995 the 55 mile per hour mandate was repealed, leaving states up to their own devices in regards to speed limits. Since then, some states have bumped that limit up to 70 miles an hour (or higher -- to 75 -- in some wide-open states such as New Mexico).
Virginia recently joined the 70-mile-per-hour club this week, according to the Wall Street Journal, after a newly elected governor made the issue a priority. All told, 34 states now allow highway speeds of 70 miles per hour or higher.
Raising speed limits rankle safety-advocate types, but I find their "more-speed-is-more-danger" reactions simplistic and, frankly, condescending. Modern cars are designed to travel safely and comfortably at 70 miles per hour (and some at much higher speeds), and while higher speeds to increase the repercussions of an accident, I don't find that enough of an argument to tell everyone they have to travel at a snail's pace -- really, have you seen how slow 55 is? -- when there's a safe, open stretch of road.
Case in point: I drove home to Los Angeles yesterday from Mammoth Lakes, about five hours North. Most of the drive is wide-open highway, with posted speed limits of 70 miles per hour, and guess what? The only time I was in a dangerous situation was when a distracted driver pulled out of a Wendy's parking lot in front of me in the small town of Bishop -- where I was traveling at 35 miles per hour. An idiot not paying attention at 35 mph is far more dangerous than an alert, responsible driver doing twice that speed or more.
Yet another state bumps up max highway speed to 70 miles per hour
Posted by Joshua Condon on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:24 AM
The national 55-mile-per-hour speed limit was enacted in 1973 -- but do you know why? Rather than a safety issue, it was a fuel-saving measure put in place as a response to the first OPEC oil embargo.
The law was later changed to allow speeds up to 65 miles per hour, and in 1995 the 55 mile per hour mandate was repealed, leaving states up to their own devices in regards to speed limits. Since then, some states have bumped that limit up to 70 miles an hour (or higher -- to 75 -- in some wide-open states such as New Mexico).
Virginia recently joined the 70-mile-per-hour club this week, according to the Wall Street Journal, after a newly elected governor made the issue a priority. All told, 34 states now allow highway speeds of 70 miles per hour or higher.
Raising speed limits rankle safety-advocate types, but I find their "more-speed-is-more-danger" reactions simplistic and, frankly, condescending. Modern cars are designed to travel safely and comfortably at 70 miles per hour (and some at much higher speeds), and while higher speeds to increase the repercussions of an accident, I don't find that enough of an argument to tell everyone they have to travel at a snail's pace -- really, have you seen how slow 55 is? -- when there's a safe, open stretch of road.
Case in point: I drove home to Los Angeles yesterday from Mammoth Lakes, about five hours North. Most of the drive is wide-open highway, with posted speed limits of 70 miles per hour, and guess what? The only time I was in a dangerous situation was when a distracted driver pulled out of a Wendy's parking lot in front of me in the small town of Bishop -- where I was traveling at 35 miles per hour. An idiot not paying attention at 35 mph is far more dangerous than an alert, responsible driver doing twice that speed or more.
Comment