Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Quickdraw
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by Will View Post
    Reminder: No politics on TBN.
    .
    .
    .
    I think Goldwater could have beaten Green Mica...

    Leave a comment:


  • Will
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by Quickdraw;556399. The Ford paint code book lists BR as "Sunburst [B
    Gold Water[/B]" and SB as "Green Mica"
    Reminder: No politics on TBN.

    Leave a comment:


  • 4LOWBIRDS+8
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    The Inca Gold's has a paint code, BI, no paint companies I could find have a formula. Had to use the scanner.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quickdraw
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by snowbird View Post
    Wonder how they would look side by side or even if one had the colour chips to compare .
    They had to have been the same color, just different codes. My guess is that Wixom had not received the correct color codes when they built these first units and created what they thought would be the natural color codes. Only later to find out those codes were assigned to different colors. The Ford paint code book lists BR as "Sunburst Gold Water" and SB as "Green Mica"

    Leave a comment:


  • snowbird
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by Quickdraw View Post
    .
    .
    Even more useless info:
    The first three 2005 Bronze Tbirds built have paint code BR - all bronze Tbirds built after that have paint code T2. The first three Bronzes made were 1FAHP60AX5Y100003, 1FAHP60A55Y100006, and 1FAHP60A75Y100007.

    Also the first two 2005 Steel Blue's carried paint code SB where the rest of the year paint code was SP. The first two Steel Blues were: 1FAHP60A15Y100004 & 1FAHP60A35Y100005.
    Wonder how they would look side by side or even if one had the colour chips to compare .

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Imagine the fun someone with one of those 5 birds would have showing up at a body shop looking to get something repainted. Great thread Harry - keep'em coming

    Leave a comment:


  • Quickdraw
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    .
    .
    Even more useless info:
    The first three 2005 Bronze Tbirds built have paint code BR - all bronze Tbirds built after that have paint code T2. The first three Bronzes made were 1FAHP60AX5Y100003, 1FAHP60A55Y100006, and 1FAHP60A75Y100007.

    Also the first two 2005 Steel Blue's carried paint code SB where the rest of the year paint code was SP. The first two Steel Blues were: 1FAHP60A15Y100004 & 1FAHP60A35Y100005.

    Leave a comment:


  • wcoates
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by Quickdraw View Post
    .
    .
    .

    Great useless fact! You can't argue that black and red were the most common colors but it's not fair to compare colors offered for all five years to those only available for one year. I could make a case that Merlot was the most popular color. But I'm sure you meant "numerous" instead of "popular".
    I stand corrected, Professor. Jeez how many professors we got here?

    Leave a comment:


  • Quickdraw
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by wcoates View Post
    The 8 most popular colors were 86.45% of the total production. or 6.38 times the other 9 colors. How's that for some useless facts Harry?
    .
    .
    .

    Great useless fact! You can't argue that black and red were the most common colors but it's not fair to compare colors offered for all five years to those only available for one year. I could make a case that Merlot was the most popular color. But I'm sure you meant "numerous" instead of "popular".

    Leave a comment:


  • wcoates
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    The 8 most popular colors were 86.45% of the total production. or 6.38 times the other 9 colors. How's that for some useless facts Harry?

    Leave a comment:


  • Quickdraw
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by Cashr22 View Post
    Can you tell me how much more it cost to have the factory boot?
    Originally posted by wcoates
    Ross for the Facsimile window stickers I have done (thought I did one for you??) I am inserting $125 for the boot (and $135 for the select shift). Believe those are correct. (I hope).

    Dealer invoice price for the boot varied from $100 to $112 depending on Canadian or USA delivery, as well as date ordered.

    The invoice price for the SST was $116

    Bill, your prices sound correct for the window sticker price.

    Leave a comment:


  • wcoates
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by Cashr22 View Post
    Can you tell me how much more it cost to have the factory boot?
    Ross for the Facsimile window stickers I have done (thought I did one for you??) I am inserting $125 for the boot (and $135 for the select shift). Believe those are correct. (I hope).

    Leave a comment:


  • 4LOWBIRDS+8
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    Originally posted by Quickdraw View Post
    .
    .
    .
    More useless info:
    For 2004 and 2005 model years, the boot was not standard equipment. There were a whopping 1,091 2004s ordered without the boot. That's about 8-1/2% of the 12,757 made that year. By 2005 apparently the dealers caught on that the boot was no longer standard and there were only 175 cars ordered without the boot. That's less than 2% of the 9,295 built for model year 2005.
    I have one of those 2004's ordered with out the boot, the VMG. I bet that makes it more rare than Blackbeauty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cashr22
    replied
    Can you tell me how much more it cost to have the factory boot?

    Leave a comment:


  • Quickdraw
    replied
    Re: Random useless facts about 2002-2005 Thunderbirds

    .
    .
    .
    More useless info:
    For 2004 and 2005 model years, the boot was not standard equipment. There were a whopping 1,091 2004s ordered without the boot. That's about 8-1/2% of the 12,757 made that year. By 2005 apparently the dealers caught on that the boot was no longer standard and there were only 175 cars ordered without the boot. That's less than 2% of the 9,295 built for model year 2005.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X